Paradoxes
Another writing pitfall teachers would urge you to avoid are paradoxes. A paradox is a contradiction that at first glance appears to make sense, but which, upon further reflection, is seen as illogical.
One example of a paradox is from George Orwell's Animal Farm (1945): 'All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.'
Sure, all animals can be equal, but how can they be more equal? In this case, the paradox serves the plot of the novel. Animal Farm begins when the animals of Manor Farm rise up against their human masters and decide to form a new society based on equality. When the pigs grow in power over the other animals, they defend their privilege with the contradictory slogan, 'All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.' While the paradoxical argument wouldn't work in an essay, it powerfully underscores the message Orwell is trying to get across.
Probably the most well-known paradox from literature is a 'catch-22', from the novel of the same name by Joseph Heller. In Catch-22, a military doctor sees a lot of pilots who are mentally unfit to fly planes in a war. When asked why these pilots aren't grounded, he says that if a pilot asks to be grounded, the pilot is seen as mentally competent, because he is sane enough to ask to be grounded in the first place.
The term 'catch-22' is often used more generally to describe a specific type of paradox where a person can't avoid a problem due to constraints that often caused the problem. One common example is how you can't get a job unless you have work experience, but you can't get work experience without a job.
Equivocations
Another type of illogical thinking that will get you in trouble with your English teacher is the use of an equivocation, the misleading use of a word or a string of words, often using alternate meanings. Equivocations usually occur as strings of sentences that, like a game of telephone, get further and further from the truth of the original statement.
One type of equivocation is referred to as 'better than nothing,' which relies on the shifting meaning of the word nothing. Here is an example:
Cabbage is better than nothing.
Nothing is better than ice cream.
Therefore, cabbage is better than ice cream.
Not many people would agree that cabbage is better than ice cream, but equating the different meanings of the word nothing makes for a very illogical argument.
Alice's Adventures in Wonderland (1865) and its sequel, Through the Looking Glass (1871), by British author Lewis Carroll, are full of double-talk and characters who confuse the literal with the figurative. It's not surprising that Carroll's Through the Looking Glass contains an equivocation involving jam:
The Queen said, 'The rule is, jam to-morrow and jam yesterday - but never jam to-day,'
'It must come sometimes to 'jam to-day',' Alice objected.
'No, it can't,' said the Queen. 'It's jam every other day: to-day isn't any other day, you know.'
'I don't understand you,' said Alice. 'It's dreadfully confusing!'
The White Queen says Alice can have jam 'every other day,' but since 'to-day' is not 'every other day' then there is never jam. 'Never jam today' or 'jam tomorrow' is sometimes used to describe unfulfilled political promises by very posh-sounding economists, especially around taxation. However, I think we've all experienced being told 'later' and find that 'later' can be pushed back indefinitely.
Lesson Summary
English teachers urge their students to avoid clichés, paradoxes, and equivocations in their essays, because they rely on faulty logic or stale comparisons. In literature, however, clichés, paradoxes, and equivocations can be used inventively by authors, especially in poetry and fiction. A cliché is a literary element that has lost its impact because it has been used so many times before. A paradox is a contradiction which often at first glance appears to make sense. Finally, an equivocation is the use of faulty logic where one meaning of a word is confused with an alternate meaning.
Learning Outcomes
This lesson should teach you to:
- Define cliché, paradox, and equivocation
- Explain why clichés, paradoxes, and equivocations should be avoided in essays
- Give examples of how clichés, paradoxes, and equivocations are used effectively in literature