Sentence Correction MCQ Set 16
Showing question 76 to 80 of total 113 MCQs
MCQ Set: 16
Solve the question on your notebook and check it by clicking (Answer and Explanation) below question.
Question No: 76
Once a hurricane is identified, it is given a name from a list drawn up by the United States Weather Service, a list that is reused after a few years, but with the names of the worst hurricanes omitted.
- but with the names of the worst hurricanes omitted
- omitting the names of the worst hurricanes
- the names of the worst hurricanes being omitted
- after they have omitted the names of the worst hurricanes
- after omitting the worst hurricane names
Answer and Explanation
Answer: A
Explanation
Option(A) is correct
It is easy to eliminate D because ‘they’ is without an antecedent. E is also clearly wrong because it suggests the names are ‘worst’ rather than the hurricanes.
There is no need to introduce ‘being’ and so eliminate C. Of choices A and B we will select A since it is clearest. B leaves us questioning ‘who is omitting?’
Question No: 77
A teacher at the school acknowledged that, despite government sponsored endeavours to improve classroom performance, an extraordinary high percentage of their students fail to gain admission to higher education.
-
an extraordinary high percentage of their students fail to gain admission to higher education
- an extraordinarily high percentage of its students fail to gain admission to higher education
-
an extraordinary high percentage of its students fails to gain admission to higher education
- the percentage of their students failing to gain admission to higher education is extraordinarily high
- a high percentage of its students, extraordinarily high in fact, fails to gain admission to higher education
Answer and Explanation
Answer: B
Explanation
Option(B) is correct
Always check pronouns first. We cannot use ‘their’ when referring to a school. So we can eliminate A and D. Next we need the adverb ‘extraordinarily’ not the adjective ‘extraordinary’ to modify ‘high’, and so we eliminate C.
Of the remaining options, E is wordy and also has a verb-subject agreement problem: a percentage of students should be treated as plural and so we need ‘fail’. Hence the answer is B.
Question No: 78
Since the path-breaking discovery, just over fifty years ago, of the structure of the DNA molecule, scientists have made astounding progress to understand and manipulate> this most important of biological molecules.
- scientists have made astounding progress to understand and to manipulate
- scientists have made astounding progress in understanding and manipulating
- astounding progress has been made by scientists to understand and to manipulate
-
scientists made astounding progress in understanding and manipulating
-
astounding progress was made by scientists in understanding and manipulating
Answer and Explanation
Answer: B
Explanation
Option(B) is correct
he idiom is ‘progress is made in’. (Eliminate A and C.) Also, with the word ‘since’ we need a present perfect tense and so the only choice is B.
Question No: 79
Written in Austria in 1762, the composer of Symphony No. 5 was a brilliant musician, Franz Joseph Haydn, who many later called the "Father of the Symphony" for his contribution to classical music while court musician for the Esterhazy family.
- the composer of Symphony No. 5 was a brilliant musician, Franz Joseph Haydn, who many later called the "Father of the Symphony" for his
- the composer of Symphony No. 5 was a brilliant musician, Franz Joseph Haydn, who many later called the "Father of the Symphony" for his
-
Franz Joseph Haydn's Symphony No. 5, who many later called the "Father of the Symphony" for his
-
Symphony No. 5 was composed by a brilliant musician, Franz Joseph Haydn, who many later called the "Father of the Symphony" for his
- Symphony No. 5's composer was a brilliant musician, Franz Joseph Haydn, whom many later called the "Father of the Symphony" for his
Answer and Explanation
Answer: E
Explanation
Option(E) is correct
A modifying phrase needs to be placed by the word it modifies. However, in the original sentence, the modifying phrase written in Austria in 1762 incorrectly modifies the composer. It makes no sense that the composer was written in Austria. Instead, Symphony No. 5 was Written in Austria in 1762.
The subject pronoun who needs to be replaced by the object pronoun whom since Haydn is not the subject of the sentence. Rather, many [individuals] later called is the subject and they are calling Haydn, who is the object, an important musician.
A. Written in Austria in 1762 illogically modifies a composer, not a composition; the subject pronoun who is used instead of the object pronoun whom
B. The pronoun who illogically refers back to Symphony No. 5
C. The subject pronoun who is used instead of the object pronoun whom
D. Written in Austria in 1762 illogically modifies a composer, not a composition
E. Written in Austria in 1762 correctly modifies a composition (Symphony No. 5, not its composer); the object pronoun whom is correctly used instead of the subject pronoun who
Question No: 80
In archaeological terms the university was a latecomer to the town, which was already centuries old by the time we first hear of the establishment of a community of scholars and teachers in the late 12th Century.
- which was already centuries old by the time we first hear of the establishment of
-
already centuries old by the time we first hear of its establishment of
- which was centuries old already when we first hear of the establishment of
-
that was already centuries old by the time we first are hearing of the establishing of
- that was already centuries old by the time we first hear that they had established
Answer and Explanation
Answer: A
Explanation
Option(A) is correct
There is nothing wrong with the use of ‘which’ in choice A, since the description correctly refers to the work in front of the comma. It is better not t spend time worrying over the choice between ‘that’ and ‘which’ – look for other clear-cut problems.
We can eliminate E because the pronoun ‘they’ does not have an antecedent. We can eliminate D because it is too wordy and uses ‘establishing’ when ‘establishment’ would have been better.
We can eliminate C because ‘already’ is in the wrong place. And finally we can eliminate B because the use of ‘its’ makes the sentence less clear than what we have in A