Critical Reasoning MCQ Set 1
Showing question 1 to 5 of total 13 MCQs
MCQ Set: 1
Solve the question on your notebook and check it by clicking (Answer and Explanation) below question.
Question No: 3
In order to reduce the number of items damaged while in transit to customers, packaging consultants recommended that the TrueSave mail-order company increase the amount of packing material so as to fill any empty spaces in its cartons. Accordingly, TrueSave officials instructed the company's packers to use more packing material than before, and the packers zealously acted on these instructions and used as much as they could. Nevertheless, customer reports of damaged items rose somewhat.
Which ofthe following, if true, mosthelps to explain why acting onthe consultants' recommendation failed to
achieve its goal?
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500CGWgEA
- The change in packing policy ledto an increase in expenditure on packing material and labor.
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500CYRaub
- When packing material is compressed too densely, it loses some of its capacityto absorb shock.
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500Cc46ds
- The amount of packing material used in a carton does not significantly influence the ease with which a customer can unpack the package.
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500CfRuR5
- Most of the goods that TrueSave shipsare electronic products that are highly vulnerable to being damaged in transit.
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500CiBhLq
- True Save has lost some of its regular customers as a result of the high number of damaged items they received
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500CkZqBf
Answer and Explanation
Answer: B
Explanation
Option(B) is correct
Option A : An increase in expenditure on packing material and labor might affect the company's profitability, but it would have no effect on whether items were damaged in transit.
Option B : Correct. This statement adequately explains why more items, rather than fewer, were damaged in transit.
Option C : If customers were able to remove their items just as easily from boxes filled with more packing material as from boxes usingless packing material, the items would be unaffected by an increase in the amount of packing material used.
Option D : The kind of goods True Save ships most frequently isnot relevant to the question of why increasing the amount of packing material failed to reduce the number ofitems damaged in transit, since they most likely shipped this same kind of goods both before and after making the recommended change.
Option E : The loss of regular customers helps explain why TrueSave turnedto the packaging consultants for help, but it does not help explain why those consultants' recommendation failed to reduce the number of items damaged in transit.
The correct answer is B.
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500Cqi1GY
Question No: 4
Wood smoke contains dangerous toxins that cause changes in human cells. Because wood smoke presents such a high health risk, legislation is needed to regulate the
use of open-air fires and wood-burning stoves.
Which of the following, if true, provides the most support for the argument above?
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500E59Re1
- The amount of dangerous toxins contained inwood smoke is much less than the amount contained in an equal volume of automobile exhaust.
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500EGw1Bu
- Within the jurisdiction covered by the proposed legislation, most heating and cooking is done with oil or natural gas.
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500EJSQy0
- Smoke produced by coal-burning stoves is significantly more toxic than smoke from wood-burning stoves
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500ELzZr3
- No significant beneficial effect on air quality would result if open-air fires were banned within the jurisdiction covered by the proposed legislation
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500EOinyh
- In valleys where wood is used as the primary heating fuel, the concentration of smoke results in poor air quality
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500ES0fer
Answer and Explanation
Answer: E
Explanation
Option(E) is correct
Option A : If wood smoke were as dangerous as carexhaust, this mightsupportthe idea of regulating it just as
exhaust emissions are regulated; but this statement tells usit isless dangerous.
Option B : This point suggests less of a need for legislation.
Option C : This information provides nosupport for the idea that the use of wood-burning stoves should be
regulated.
Option D : The lack ofbenefit from banning open-air fires isa point against thelegislation.
Option E : Correct. This supports the argument in favor of legislation.
The correct answer is E.
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500EbeqEl
Question No: 5
An industry wants to change its policy concerning daily working hours. Currently, this company requires all employees
to arrive at work at 7 a.m. The proposed policy would permit each employee to decide when to arrive-from as early as 5 a.m. to as late as 10 a.m.
The adoption of this policy would be most likely to decrease employees’ productivity if the employees’ job functions required them to
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500F26vv7
- work without interruption from other employees
- consult at least once a day with employees from other companies
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500FtqUqG
- submit their work for a supervisor’s eventual approval
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500FwML7R
- interact frequently with each other throughout the entire workday
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500FyP33k
- undertake projects that take several days to complete
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500G0PZoX
Answer and Explanation
Answer: D
Explanation
Option(D) is correct
Option A : Working without interruption would likely mean improved productivity.
Option B : Assuming that all employees are in the same time zone (we are not told otherwise), the flexible hours would still leave plenty of time for at least one daily consultation during the regular business hours of the workday.
Option C : Eventual approval indicates that the flexibility exists to permit employees’ submissions at any time.
Option D : Correct. The wide range of flexibility in regards to working hours would make frequent interaction difficult, if not impossible, and would be likely to
decrease employees’ productivity.<
Option E : We are not told that the projects involve significant interaction; so such projects would be accomplished just as easily on the proposed flexible schedule.
The correct answer is D.
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500GB7KC1
Question No: 1
Electricity would revolutionize agriculture according to a prediction of the not-so-distant future published in 1940. Electrodes would be inserted into the soil, and the current between them would kill bugs and weeds and make crop plants stronger.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly indicates that the logic of the prediction above is flawed?
- In order for farmers to avoid electric shock while working in the fields, the current could be turned off at such times without diminishing the intended effects
- If the proposed plan for using electricity were put into practice, farmers would save on chemicals now being added to the soil.
- t cannot be taken for granted that the use of electricity is always beneficial.
- Since weeds are plants, electricity would affect weeds in the same way as it would affect crop plants.
- Because a planting machine would need to avoid coming into contact with the electrodes, new parts for planting machines would need to be designed.
Answer and Explanation
Answer: D
Explanation
Option(D) is correct
Option A : The logic of the prediction has nothing to do with whether the current can be turned on and off; rather, it is concerned with the current itself and its
effects.
Option B : Rather than suggesting that the logic of the prediction is flawed, this serves to support the prediction: Farmers saving on chemicals would be part of the
predicted agricultural revolution.
Option C : The argument does not take for granted that the use of electricity is always beneficial; it merely suggests that it would be of great benefit to agriculture.
Option D : Correct. This statement properly identifies a problem with the prediction: It provides no reason to believe that the electricity would affect crop plants and
weeds differently.
Option E : Rather than suggesting that the logic of the prediction is flawed, this serves to support the prediction: Changes in planting machines would be part of the
predicted agricultural revolution.
Question No: 2
The Maxilux car company's design for its new luxury model, the Max 100, included a special design for the tires. That was intended to complement the model's image.
The winning bid for supplying these tires was submitted by Rubco. Analysts concluded that the bid would only just cover Rubco's costs on the tires, but Rubcoexecutives claim that winning the bid will actually make a profit for the company.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly justifies the claim made by Rubco's executives?
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500ArkqmW
- In any Maxilux model, the spare tire is exactly the same make and model as the tires that are mounted on the wheels
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500B9tHCP
- Rubco holds exclusive contracts to supply Maxilux with the tires for a number ofother models made by Maxilux.
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500BCOr6G
- The production facilities for the Max 100and thosefor thetires to be supplied by Rubco are located very near each other.
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500BEn6bv
- When people who have purchased a carefully designed luxury automobile need to replace a worn part of it, they almost invariably replace it with a part of exactly the same make and type.
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500BIhQBY
- When Maxilux awardedthe tire contract to Rubco, the only criterion on which Rubco's bidwas clearly ahead of its competitors' bids was price.
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500BmOs7J
Answer and Explanation
Answer: D
Explanation
Option(D) is correct
Option A : We have already been told that the bid is expected to barely cover the costs of supplying the tires on the newcars, so the analysts mentioned in the passage have presumably already taken into account that there is a sparetire supplied forthe Max 100.
Option B : If winning the bid led Rubco to win more exclusive contracts with the Maxilux, that might help support the executives' claim. But this statementindicatesonlythat Rubco already has several exclusive contracts to supply Maxilux with tires, not that winning the bid has led to, or will lead to, more such contracts, which is what would be needed.
Option C : As in answer choice (A), this is relevantto the costsof supplyingthe tires for the Max 100, but presumably this was taken into account by the analysts when they concluded that the bid would barely cover Rubco's costson the tires.
Option D : Correct. This indicates that by winning the bid Rubco has create the way to profit from the contract with Maxilux, specifically, by creating a market for replacement tires.
Option E : This is likely oneof the reasons that Rubco's bidonly just covers the Rubco's costs on the tires; it does nothing to justify the executives' claims that the bid will lead to a profit for Rubco. >br>
The correct answer is D.
Read more at www.lofoya.com: http://www.lofoya.com/Verbal-Test-Questions-and-Answers/Critical-Reasoning/l1p1#ixzz500BstZFX