Analytical Reasoning MCQ No. : 47514
Each group of questions is based on a brief premise and a set of rules. In answering the questions, you might find it helpful to draw rough diagrams. For each question, select the best answer from the five lettered choices.
Some lawyers are of the view that the observation of the intrinsic qualities of pornography in any composition depends on literary criticism and hence it is a matter of opinion. It is rather odd, though, that in a legal connection,
serious critics themselves quite often behave as if they believed criticism to be a matter of opinion. Why be a critic - and teach in universities - in case criticism involves nothing but uttering capricious and arbitrary opinions ?
The above discussion would be weakened if it is pointed out that:
- literary critics are of the opinion that nothing is pornographic.
- lawyers believe that the observance of the qualities of pornography is a matter of opinion, as literary critics are not in agreement in this regard.
- literary critics are not legal authorities.
- literary critics should not concern themselves with deciding what is pornographic.
- literary critics in the teaching profession at the university level are init only for the money.