Loading...
All Topics

What Would You Prefer: Wealth or Fame

OUTLINE
  1. Introduction.
  2. Advantages of wealth.
  3. Love of fame.
  4. Fame v/s wealth.
  5. Advantages of fame.

What Would You Prefer: Wealth or Fame

When a man begins his career in right earnest, he is attracted by two forces, namely wealth or fame. He has to fix his aim on either of them, for, to get both of them is very difficult, if not impossible.

Wealth is more attractive than fame. “Money,” said a witty Frenchman. “Is the Sovereign of Sovereigns?” Money gives us the means of acquiring what we wish. We can enjoy ourselves dainty dishes, put on fashionable clothes, reside in palatial buildings, get best entertainments, visit foreign countries, and have numerous other luxuries with the help of wealth. If we have money, we can help our friends and relative in ‘distress.

From this point of view, fame is surpassed by wealth. Fame cannot procure any of these things for us. We often find famous persons in the grip of financial difficulties. Love of wealth makes us industrious. A philosopher has rightly said that our present progress in all the spheres of life is due to the love of wealth. More love of fame in a few of us would have kept us in darkness.

All the same love of fame is nobler than the love of money. In acquiring or rather amassing wealth, we often have to adopt dishonest means. We have to flatter one man, bride another and deceive the third. Generally it is not so in acquiring fame. A poet or a painter cannot get fame by dishonest methods. But in the sphere of politics, some persons do adopt underhand practices for coming in limelight. Wealth leads to various views, while fame does not entourage them. This does not mean that famous men have no vices. But they have to avoid vices to maintain their fame. Wealth is a burden. While fame is like a light feather.

A man who is after wealth, wants wealth at any cost. We have heard of many examples of persons who have betrayed their country’ for the sake of money. Famous persons may be selfish in their on way, but they know. That their fame depends upon their merit, and have thus to behave in certain way. Betrayal by them of their country will soon change their fame into notoriety. Wealth implies on merit in the persons possessing it. Though in flattery we describe him possessing many qualities of head and heart. As against this fame implies some merit. One may become wealthy by accident. Hut it is difficult to get fame in that way. A poet a painter a politician, a scientist or a social worker has to show his worth before he becomes famous.

Wealth is temporary while fame is stable. A wealthy person may lose his shaft by one day or another any day. Bui fame will not be lost so quickly. If a man is careful he can not only maintain his fame, but can also enhance it. Some wealthy men become famous, but their fame is lost with their wealth. Some famous men do get wealth but they maintain their fame even when they lose wealth. A wealthy man is respected in his on circle. While a famous man is respected wherever he is known. A healthy man is soon forgotten after his death, while the fragrance of fame smells sweet and blossoms in the dust. The heirs of a wealthy man get wealth and often turn out fools, while the heirs of a famous men work hard to maintain that fame.

sometimes fame acts as a current coin. Qua id-i-Azam had no wealth, but his own word was enough to fetch million of rupees at his feet. He gave food to the starving clothes to the naked and shelters to the destitute thought a penny in his pocket.

If I can get both fame and wealth, I would certainly like to have both of them. But fame without wealth is better than wealth with out fame. I shall prefer fame to wealth.