Loading...
All Topics

Nationalistion

OUTLINE
  1. Introduction.
  2. Three firms of nationalization.
  3. Arguments of the people who supports nationalism.
  4. Arguments of the people who oppose it.
  5. Conclusion.

Nationalistion

The distinguishing feature in the political world today is the disappearance of the monarchy in many countries of the world and the appearance of popular governments in them. It is a new venture which is still young. The ideal of monarchy had held the field for many centuries. The new popular governments that are on the saddle in many countries cannot boast of such a long record or illustrious pedigree.

Three distinct types stand out in popular management nationalization -- the democratic form, the socialistic form and the form. The advanced nations of the west--the U.S.A Great Britain and France are all democracies. Even where the survives as in Norway Sweden in Belgium, there is democratic set-up. The communist form exists in the U.S.S.R. a” her allies.

The democratic form depends upon the will of the people as exercised through votes in elections. Different parties contest the elections. The Government is run according to parliamentary traditions. Private capital and enterprise form the backbone of the system. In socialist and communist countries, the power is largely in the hands of the socialist or communist party. The socialists and the communists believe in nationalization — that is taking over and managing of industries, mines, transport, banks, etc. in fact, all the vital aspects of industry and commerce.

The supporters of nationalization urge that as much as all the people of the country have to be engaged in work (i.e., kept employed) and the profits of the undertakings made valuable to the State, nationalization is necessary. Under nationalization, the State dictates the procedure and mops up the profits. The laborers would have flow option but to merely obey and accept what the State awards them b way of wages.

Those who oppose nationalization point out its inherent defects. First nationalization saps private initiative and enterprise. Secondly it reduces human effort to a dead monotonous level. Thirdly it makes sheep of the people who gradually drift into a condition of being led. Fourthly, it inhibits the enthusiasm of the people which will become slaves of the State.

The problem of nationalization looms large in underdeveloped countries. Only State management can bring into being huge steel. Fertilizer and other basic industries and immense irrigation projects. There will be chaos if the post. Telegraph and communications pass out of the hands of the State. And when the State engages itself in these tasks and tastes the immensity of the power, it is apt to think of nationalization of over enterprises too in the name of planning. Then arises the real danger to popular control. If the electorate thinks deeply over the matter and takes and effective decision, nationalization can be kept within bounds and made to yield beneficial results.